One of the possible consequences of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be popliteus tendon impingement which, although rare, results in significant pain for some patients.

Similar migration and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for medial congruent (MC) and cruciate‑retaining (CR) tibial components.

Instability after total knee arthroplasty is a common but poorly understood complication and very often leads to revision surgery to help correct the instability that may have built up over time, following the initial procedure.

This 2022 study examined the tibiofemoral kinematics and patient outcomes of knee replacement surgery using two different implants – the medial congruent (MC) bearing and the cruciate retaining (CR) bearing.

Novice surgeons who listen to AC/DC may be faster while maintaining accuracy during laparoscopic surgery.

New figures reveal a triple-digit percentage point rise in patients paying out of their own pockets, when comparing July to September 2019 figures against the same period in 2021.

Conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) replacement studies have shown that pain, instability and limitation of the range of motion are the most commonly reported symptoms among unsatisfied patients. The major cause of unsuccessful TKA are inadequate alignment and errors in balancing.

While often successful in reducing pain, improving knee function and therefore quality of life, TKR does not necessarily restore full range of motion of the pre-operative joint.

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is a less invasive alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of end-stage arthritis^1-4. 

This study was undertaken to evaluate the safety of a same-day surgery protocol using the partial knee replacement (PKR).

Based on meta-analysis of 52 articles and more than 4,500 patients, the mini-subvastus approach for TKA demonstrated superior overall, when compared to the others.

NICE quality statement announces patients with isolated medial compartmental osteoarthritis will be given the choice of partial or total knee replacement.

NHS COVID recovery plan highlights important role for digital solutions

Cementless TKA delivers similar outcomes to cemented TKA at lower procedural costs¹

This observation was amplified in younger patients (< 65 years)

A multicentre international study of 77 patients receiving a Medial Congruent (MC) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) between 2016 and 2018

Two-year clinical trial concludes that recovery after partial knee arthroplasty is significantly faster than total knee arthroplasty.

Personalizing knee alignment with 3D planning and patient specific instruments.

A review of the opportunities & challenges for telemedicine in orthopaedics

Cementless fixation may deliver better long-term functional recovery than cemented fixation.

Robotic-assisted surgery delivers more accurate and reproducible limb alignment than conventional instrumentation.

The benefits of improved accuracy, reproducibility and personalized alignment.

Could this recent study of UK National Joint Registry data provide the answer?

Recent study suggests that same day discharge post TKA does not affect early pain or functional outcomes

Survival with implant revision for aseptic failure as the end point: 99.57%²

This classification provides a simple and comprehensive system for describing knee alignment¹

Find out why some surgeons are aiming “for biological fixation in all future arthroplasty surgery.” ¹

At one year, patients receiving a Medial Congruent (MC) bearing reported significantly higher Forgotten Joints Scores (FJS) than those receiving a Cruciate Retaining (CR) bearing (71.6 Vs 58.7; p = 0.02) ¹.

New evidence suggests that a fixed-bearing partial knee replacement is an excellent option.

Investigators observe a migration pattern comparable to that of a well-proven symmetrical tibial design. ¹

Findings from a propensity score matched study of 10,494 procedures support the use of PKR in a fast-track set-up whenever it is indicated. ¹

A systematic review finds current evidence “very convincing” ¹

Constrained-Condylar-Knees (CCK) shown to outperform less-constrained alternatives in patients with high grade varus osteoarthritis (OA). ¹

“New technologies have increased the ability to restore native knee kinematics with TKR” ¹

New study advocates for PKR in very elderly patients ¹

A recent systematic review of robotic-assisted TKR surgery shows improved implant alignment, less soft-tissue trauma, and better early functional outcomes compared to conventional instrumentation ¹

Cementless TKR was associated with better clinical outcomes than cemented TKR in a meta-analysis of recent randomised controlled trials (RCT) in patients aged ≤ 60 years¹

Telemedicine is expanding rapidly in orthopaedics and is delivering high satisfaction and cost-effectiveness ¹

New playbook to support the implementation of an evidence-based pathway optimisation philosophy¹.

Findings from a recent cadaver study on extensor efficiency of unicompartmental (UKR), bicompartmental (BCR), and total knee arthroplasty (TKR) may help explain the superior function and satisfaction reported by PKR patients¹.   

Promising results for a patient specific and personalized surgical technique.

A comparison with the most widely used and clinically proven total knee system in the world.

In a study of 200 revision knees, 116/58% were revised for instability¹.

Surgical robot market to quadruple from 2018 levels to $6.8 billion by 2026¹.

A News Medical review of the TOPKAT (Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial), published in the Lancet suggests they could¹

A recent MEDINSIDE article reports on the findings from a survey of health care workers across 26 Swiss hospitals.¹

New study describes a hybrid technique that allows both “mechanically-sound and soft tissue-friendly alignment targets to be identified and achieved.¹”

Explore the benefits of PKR vs TKR in our new digital guide

How the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption and integration of digital health tools in orthopaedics.

Based on the available clinical evidence, many of the historic beliefs about PKR contraindications can be called into question. In this series we examine some of the most common misconceptions. This week: pain location.

BODS/BOA Survey: To clear the backlog in 12 months, arthroplasty surgeons would have to operate at 133-170% of their ‘normal’ capacity¹

Find out how with The National Day Surgery Delivery Pack. Do you want to improve patient care and satisfaction…

According to the literature nearly 50% of patients are suitable for PKR.¹ This interactive PDF will help you to identify them.

Suitable patients are to be offered an informed choice of PKR or TKR. How many patients with isolated medial compartmental osteoarthritis would favour partial over total knee replacement if all of them were offered the choice?

If you are a surgeon, GP, or part of the hospital management team who work in the knee health care sector then you’re in the right place!

Promising early outcomes for a personalized knee system suggest they might be¹.

What do you currently offer patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis?

Up to 32% of patients have reported knee instability with activity limitation and pain six months after TKR. ¹

A discrete-choice experiment evaluating TKR & PKR

Partial Knee replacement is Personalized Knee Replacement. Research has shown that PKR patients are more likely to forget their joint replacement than TKR patients.¹, ²

Cementless tibial components may offer an advantage in patients with a life expectancy of more than 11 years. ¹

This systematic review of alignment options in TKR describes a technique that: “like partial replacement techniques for knees… is a ‘patient specific’ and ‘ligament sparing’ technique to restore… the native pre-arthritic limb and joint alignments and knee laxity…”¹

The quest for the forgotten knee

Although you can generally expect excellent survivorship from most knee replacements, today’s patients are more demanding, and their definition of ‘success’ has changed.