Register for the Forum

  • After registration you will receive an email to verify your email address. Once confirmed, your account will need activation by an administrator. Once activated you will receive an email to confirm.

Forum Rules

In addition to the terms of use (below) the following rules apply

  • Discussion and post of any product off-label usage is prohibited.
  • Prior to uploading any medical images or other patient personal data, the users must ensure they have obtained the necessary permissions or consent to share these images in the Forum without restrictions and any personal data identifying features have been removed or blurred.
  • Misleading or factually untrue statements or posts about products or discussed cases are prohibited.
  • Any obscene, vulgar, discriminating or abusive language in your post or comments is prohibited.
  • When discussing cases, to avoid misunderstandings, refrain from using misleading, ironic or humorous comments.

Best practice

  • To make case discussions meaningful to other Members, please provide relevant background information on patients or cases using anonymized patient data.
  • Please check whether a topic / question is already being discussed before starting a new thread.
  • Allow email notifications to receive updates on discussions you are participating in.

Click here for the terms of use

The Knee Care Press


Better outcomes after mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty

Based on meta-analysis of 52 articles and more than 4,500 patients, the mini-subvastus approach for TKA demonstrated superior overall, when compared to the others.

Medial parapatellar (MPP) remains the classical and preferred approach for TKA. Apart from MPP, options include the mini-medial parapatellar (MMPP), mini-subvastus (MSV), mini-midvastus (MMV), and quadriceps-sparing (QS) approaches.

Data from 4,500 patients was collected to compare and contrast the various methods used and the relative outcomes for the patients concerned. The research revealed a number of constituents of what could be considered a successful outcome, such as length of hospital stay, blood loss, recovery time, ease of use, accuracy and other variables. The idea, of course, with the minimally invasive techniques is to reduce the hospital stay and to provide a quicker recovery for the patient.

The popular MPP method involves exposure of the knee surfaces, allowing surgeons to see exactly what they are doing and where they are positioning the new components. The minimally invasive nature of other methods may discourage some surgeons as there are visibility and augmented difficulties when installing new joints, which can lead to misplacement. Implant malposition can relate to instability, loosening and consequent joint failure. Nonetheless, effective and accurate minimally invasive surgery does seem to provide the best overall outcomes for most patients.

The study concluded that that the mini-subvastus method for total knee arthroplasty is probably the best of the options overall, considering all of the variables. However, further studies are being undertaken to consider the needs of both surgeon and patient to offer a clearer picture about which of the currently available procedures is preferable.

Migliorini et al. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology. 2020 Aug;30(6):979-992. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02648-9. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

Read more here:

Email a Colleague

  • An email will be sent to your colleague with a link to the forum.