Register for the Forum

  • After registration you will receive an email to verify your email address. Once confirmed, your account will need activation by an administrator. Once activated you will receive an email to confirm.

Forum Rules

In addition to the terms of use (below) the following rules apply

  • Discussion and post of any product off-label usage is prohibited.
  • Prior to uploading any medical images or other patient personal data, the users must ensure they have obtained the necessary permissions or consent to share these images in the Forum without restrictions and any personal data identifying features have been removed or blurred.
  • Misleading or factually untrue statements or posts about products or discussed cases are prohibited.
  • Any obscene, vulgar, discriminating or abusive language in your post or comments is prohibited.
  • When discussing cases, to avoid misunderstandings, refrain from using misleading, ironic or humorous comments.

Best practice

  • To make case discussions meaningful to other Members, please provide relevant background information on patients or cases using anonymized patient data.
  • Please check whether a topic / question is already being discussed before starting a new thread.
  • Allow email notifications to receive updates on discussions you are participating in.

Click here for the terms of use

The Knee Care Press


Can a more anatomic TKR design reduce post-op patellofemoral pain?

A comparison with the most widely used and clinically proven total knee system in the world.

At minimum 5 years follow-up KSS, KSSF, OKS, FJS and Kujala AKP scores were all statistically significantly greater for the anatomic design than for the NexGen knee system. Range of motion was also significantly higher in the anatomic group1.

The Kujala AKP score is a recognized measure used within the field of orthopaedics to assess patellofemoral pain1. The authors acknowledged that anterior knee pain is one of the common factors leading to patient dissatisfaction and revision knee surgeries, and concluded that the lower percentage of patients with residual anterior knee pain in the anatomic group could be attributed to the design modifications of anatomical knee implants1.

This was a study of 63 patients that received a NexGen CR Knee between January and December 2013, and an Anatomic CR knee on the contralateral side between January and June 20141.

Rajgopal, A., et al. A Five-Year Comparative Functional and Clinical Evaluation of Two Contemporary Cruciate-Retaining Knee Implants. Arthroplasty Today. 2020; 6: 369-377. Find the source here.

Email a Colleague

  • An email will be sent to your colleague with a link to the forum.