Register for the Forum

  • After registration you will receive an email to verify your email address. Once confirmed, your account will need activation by an administrator. Once activated you will receive an email to confirm.

Forum Rules

In addition to the terms of use (below) the following rules apply

  • Discussion and post of any product off-label usage is prohibited.
  • Prior to uploading any medical images or other patient personal data, the users must ensure they have obtained the necessary permissions or consent to share these images in the Forum without restrictions and any personal data identifying features have been removed or blurred.
  • Misleading or factually untrue statements or posts about products or discussed cases are prohibited.
  • Any obscene, vulgar, discriminating or abusive language in your post or comments is prohibited.
  • When discussing cases, to avoid misunderstandings, refrain from using misleading, ironic or humorous comments.

Best practice

  • To make case discussions meaningful to other Members, please provide relevant background information on patients or cases using anonymized patient data.
  • Please check whether a topic / question is already being discussed before starting a new thread.
  • Allow email notifications to receive updates on discussions you are participating in.

Click here for the terms of use

The Knee Care Press


Do activities of daily living take more effort for TKR patients?

Findings from a recent cadaver study on extensor efficiency of unicompartmental (UKR), bicompartmental (BCR), and total knee arthroplasty (TKR) may help explain the superior function and satisfaction reported by PKR patients1.   

The investigators employed a knee extension rig, and a “previously validated method of restrained extension under muscle loading” to measure the extension moment with a repeated measures design1.

16 cadaveric knees were divided into two groups:

  • 8 underwent a medial Oxford® PKR, followed by the addition of a Gender Solutions™ Patello-femoral Joint (PFJ). These were then carefully removed, and a NexGen CR was implanted.
  • 8 underwent a lateral Oxford Fixed Lateral, followed by the addition of a Gender PFJ. These were then carefully removed, and a NexGen CR was implanted

When compared with the native knee, significant decreases in extensor efficiency were observed following TKR. 1 By comparison, the implantation of medial or lateral PKRs had no impact on extension moment arm or efficiency1. BCR (medial or lateral PKR + patellofemoral replacement) showed a small decline in extensor moment arm between 70 and 90° of flexion (p < 0.05) 1. Within this range of motion, however, this change was perceived to have little impact on extensor efficiency during daily activities1. By contrast, large decreases in extension moment arm were observed at low flexion angles following TKR (p < 0.05). This was associated with significant reductions in extensor efficiency of between 12% and 43% within the daily activity ranges1. 

These findings suggest that to achieve the same level of function as PKR or BCR patients, TKR patients must expend significantly more effort/energy, particularly during activities requiring increased levels of quadriceps activity and high cycle numbers, like fast walking1.

Based on these observations, and previous literature indicating that patients with better extensor strength report better outcomes, the authors suggest that: “the conversion of a PKR to BCR in the event of subsequent degeneration may preserve extensor efficiency and potentially improve functional outcomes for the patient1.”

  1. Garner, A., et al. The extensor efficiency of unicompartmental, bicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty. Bone & Joint Research. 2021; 10 (1).

Email a Colleague

  • An email will be sent to your colleague with a link to the forum.