According to the authors, this technique was shown

• To enable faster recovery,
• Deliver better functional outcomes,
• And lower rates of residual pain,
  compared to mechanical alignment.

At short-term follow-up (max 2 years), reoperation and revision rates were similar.

Better functional scores were attributed to the nature of the technique, which is a “true knee resurfacing” and “almost a pure bone procedure” that “reproducibly restores the patient-specific femorotibial joint obliquity and soft-tissue laxity, to generate better knee kinematics, and potentially less knee balance complications compared to mechanically aligned TKR.”

Check out the paper for:

• A detailed description of the technique
• A summary of the benefits and potential concerns
• An algorithm for patient selection/exclusion